The secod stripper says the accuser tolder her to “put marks” on her to make the rape story believable.

As readers know, I’m entirely in the anti-Nifong camp at this point. But I should say this smells fishy to me. Why would the second stripper keep making her story juicier and jucier? You’d think she would have told this story to 60 Minutes already. I find it a little tough to believe she was holding back. It’s not like she was protecting her friend in the 60 Minutes interview with what she told Ed Bradley. But maybe she was and we’ll get to the botton of that. Regardless, this clearly makes Nifong’s case nigh-upon unwinnable.

Also, I think we should stop calling it the Duke Lacrosse Rape scandal and simply call it the Nifong scandal. Why keep the stigma on those kids or on an event that almost surely didn’t happen.