To me, the most interesting finding in the Pew Centerโ€™s new study on independent votersโ€“which John Avlon uses to plug his move-left-on-social-issues strategy for the GOPโ€“concerns regulation. We have been told that the financial crisis would lead the public to embrace a larger regulatory role for the government and discredit advocates of the free market. (Harold Meyerson sounds this theme in pretty much his every column in the Washington Post.) Pew doesnโ€™t find the massive swing the public discussion might lead one to expect. Asked whether โ€œgovernment regulation of business usually does more harm than good,โ€ majorities continue to agree. There has been only a three-point decline in agreement since 2007 (from 57 to 54 percent).

Republicans have become much more anti-regulation and Democrats much more pro-regulation; independents have seen a 4-point shift toward regulation that still leaves them skeptical. (They went from 59 to 55 percent agreement.)

As for Avlonโ€™s interpretation of the data, I think the questions Pew asks on social issues have limited salience. The fact that most people donโ€™t think that school boards should fire teachers for being gay, for example, just doesnโ€™t say all that much about GOP strategy.