Ramesh, I may be wrong, but as I understand it, racial preferences were
largely not established through “democratically enacted laws.” Race
preferences have been established for the most part through a combination
of administrative regulation (originally, by the Nixon White House), and
later confirmed by the courts. The public opposes race preferences, and
when given a chance to vote on them, they generally disallow them. The
striking thing about race preferences is that legislators tend to avoid the
issue, preferring to leave the matter to the courts. True, Title IX of the
Higher Education Act–which prohibits discrimination in college sports–is a
law. But it was turned into a quota system–against the meaning and intent
of the original legislation–by Clinton administration bureaucrats. Then
the bureaucratic revolution was confirmed by judges. I’m open to
correction here. I don’t have chapter and verse on this. But as I
understand it, the preference revolution was largely enacted via an end run
around legislatures by bureaucrats and judges.






Comments