I got some reader flak for my โMore mush from the wimpโ crack about the president, and maybe I deserved it. But Iโd suggest that the presidentโs approach to immigration enforcement, and domestic issues in general (as opposed to foreign policy) legitimately opens him to the charge, whereas calling Hastert an โidiotโ is a much more sweeping and gratuitously derogatory charge, likely prompted by his unsophisticated, Midwestern-high-school-wrestling-coach demeanor. Since Frist is arguably a worse leader in the Senate than Hastert is in the House, is Frist also an โidiotโ? Or does his medical degree insulate from that charge?
Share this story

About the Author
Mark Krikorian is the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments