Some interesting e-mails in re my negative remarks about Sgr. Buttiglione.
No, I am not anti-Catholic. If I were, I should not have lasted long at
National Review! And I cannot forbear pointing out that every time I attend
Holy Communion I assert, with the Minister and all the rest of the
congregation, that: “We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic
Church…” It is true that I have put myself in bad odor with certain
sections of the Irish-American community by saying very rude things about
Irish terrorists, which some people take to mean I am anti-Catholic. (At
least, that is what these people took it to mean up to about, oh, September
11, 2001, since when they have been strangely quiet.)
I do, though, in spite of having changed nationalities, still have the
Englishman’s congenital suspicion of Papal ambitions. I suppose this is
absurd in our day and age, when what were once the great menacing powers of
Catholic Europe now have imploding ex-Christian populations sunk in
hedonism, and fast-swelling Muslim ones afire with religious passion. I am
sure, though, that those congenital suspicions underlie much of British
opposition to the growing power of the EU; and contrariwise, that dreams of
a new Holy Roman Empire — with lots of jobs for scholarly
priest-bueaucrats, in which they can boss other people around and tell them
what is and isn’t moral — dance, like visions of sugarplums, in the heads
of many Europhiles, as I believe they do in the head of Sgr. Buttiglione.
In our meeting with him on Monday, Sgr. Buttiglione raised the old “Athens
and Jerusalem” formula of the origins of Western culture. Every time I hear
this, I find myself thinking: It wasn’t *just* Athens and Jerusalem. The
Anglo-Saxon (you can say “Anglo-Saxon-Celtic,” if you like, as historian
John Lukacs does) peoples brought something to the mix, too; something not
so easy to list off in books that students must read, since those peoples
were illiterate when they first brought it, but something critical and
extraordinary none the less.
The old tribal customs of the north-German forests, which developed into the
Moots and Things and Parlements of the Middle Ages — the idea that large
public matters ought not be decided until different opinions have been aired
and different orders of the community consulted — was as important to the
development of the modern West, particularly of the United States, as
anything we got from Athens or Jerusalem. My guess is that Sgr. Buttiglione
would not agree with that, or perhaps would not understand it.






Comments