Lots of defenses of Hewitt and criticisms that I’m being unfair coming in. The gist: He’s of the elite but he’s not a practitioner of elitism etc, etc. I’m not going to get into a big argument about this because it’s such a tired subject and I was merely having some good-natured fun at Hewitt’s expense. But, I still see no reason why support for Miers by Hewitt is proof that he has transcended or eschewed elitism while opposition to Miers is prima facie proof of the opposite.

About the Author
Jonah Goldberg is a National Review contributing editor.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments