From a reader:

Observing National Reviews barely covert support for Rudy Giulaini, a man to the left of Bill Clinton, it’s not hard to conclude that the magazine is a shadow of its former self.
The man possesses more flaws than all the other candidates combined, but the readers of your publication or web site will never hear about them.

This is exactly the sort of thing I’m talking about. There is no way you can be an actual, serious, reader of the magazine (you know, that paper thing) and think NR has exhibited “barely covert support for Rudy Giulaini [sic].” You might come to that conclusion from reading the Corner. But for the twelve-hundred trillionth time, the Corner is not National Review and National Review is not the Corner. If you’ve been reading Ramesh or Kate in the magazine, you simply wouldn’t send an email like this. Period, full stop.