Jonathan, your points are well taken but surely it should be of interest if some of the most prestigious attorneys representing detainees at Guantanamo say they are working pro bono but are in fact being secretly paid by foreign interests who prefer to remain anonymous. (And don’t expect the MSM to pull reporters off investigations into U.S. intelligence efforts to find out.)

Also: Cully apologized for him remarks. Why isn’t that adequate? Again, is there any doubt that he’d still have his job had he complained about the quantity or quality of lawyers representing Guantanamo detainees?