A reader:
“That article you posted from the BBC was one of the most frightening things
I ever read. It was especially horrifying because it was so understated and
matter-of-fact. I would have at least felt comfortable if it had contained
liberal rantings about sensitivity and the like. Instead, it read like the
most typical of police blotters.
“I never imagined that the next Orwellian state would come about not of the
fascist hatred or the communist collectivism, but of the so-called sanctity
of political correctness. Don’t dare say something rude–You’ll be taking
the state’s power away!”
Well, some of us conservatives have been saying for years that “political
correctness” is fundamentally totalitarian in its tendency, if not always
(on a personal level, I mean) in its intention. Now we see the beast
unsheath its claws.
We should all be thinking very hard about this. The Muslim cleric whose
Op-Ed I just posted makes a case. It’s not a bad case; and, as I said, a
high level of civilization and personal liberty may be able to co-exist with
laws against blasphemy. But is this what we want? And where does it stop?
Should we write laws against all bad manners?
The old informal understandings and arrangements — what Jonah calls “The
Rules” — have all been cut down, as have all the structures of informal
authority (parents, teachers, ministers, cops) that used to enforce them.
Now we are — to borrow Thomas More’s figure — standing naked on the plain,
looking to a credentialed clerisy of lawyers, judges, and bureaucrats to
protect us against the wind. Unfortunately, their heads are full of PoMo
lefty nonsense…






Comments