This is something I should know, but don’t. Maybe Ramesh or K-Lo or someone could enlighten me. I assume that most pro-lifers, at least as a practical matter, don’t believe abortion is unconstitutional. After all, the folks supporting a constitutional amendment must believe on some level that such an amendment is necessary to make abortion unconstitional. But are there many pro-life legal scholars who argue that abortion is already unconstitutional given a “proper” reading of the constitution? I seem to remember Hadley Arkes making this argument but I might have that wrong. I can imagine this divides the natural law types from the original understanding types. But I don’t think I’ve heard of a judge making that case. Just curious.