Thereโ€™s a lengthy piece in todayโ€™s Guardian that, none too subtly, attempts to draw comparisons between the climate in todayโ€™s America and the McCarthy era. Among the highlights:

A description by that well-known Sovietophile, Vichy boulevardier and โ€˜philosopherโ€™, Jean-Paul Sartre, of the execution of the Rosenbergs as:

โ€œA legal lynching that has covered a whole nation in bloodโ€.

Hmmm, Sartre. Could that be the same Sartre that said Khruschevโ€™s denunciation of Stalinโ€™s crimes should be kept secret lest it โ€œdiscourageโ€ the working class?

And then thereโ€™s this:

โ€œInvestigations and revelations since the end of the cold war have revealed that Julius Rosenberg probably did pass secrets to the Soviet Union, although nothing remotely as serious as those relating to the atomic bomb.โ€

Curiously, the article does not cite, for example, comments such as this (from papers summarized by former Soviet spy Vasili Mitrokhin):

โ€œโ€ฆDavid Greenglass was recruited through a group of S&T agents run by Julius Rosenberg (codenamed successively ANTENNA and LIBERALโ€ฆThe members of the Rosenberg ring, who included his wife Ethelโ€ฆwere producing so many classified documents to be photographed โ€ฆthat the New York residency was running short of film. The residency reported that Rosenberg was receiving so much intelligence from his agents that he was finding it difficult to cope. โ€œWe are afraid of putting LIBERAL out of action with overwork.โ€