An editorial paragraph from the new (July 4, 2005) issue of National Review:
Intent upon consolidating and abusing power to further their own agenda . . . people who have no shame about what they’re doing . . . people who have never been acquainted with the truth . . . it’s only our Constitution and country at stake.” Okay, okay. We didn’t like the Clintons, neither Mr. nor Mrs.; we said many harsh things about the Clintons when Mr. was president; we said some of these very things. But even conservatives — especially conservatives — must realize that time moves on. To fight Hillary Clinton in 2005 with the hot-blooded rhetoric of the late Nineties (however justified it was at the time) is to stay stuck in the past — Wait, wait: All those things were said by Hillary Clinton herself, of W. and the GOP, at a “Women for Hillary” fundraiser in New York a couple of weeks ago. Strange how the mind works. Psychoanalysts call it splitting, and projection. Our fee is $200, we take insurance, come back the same time next week.
Love it love it love it. Pithy, witty, brassy, shin-kicking, sacred cow-tipping, you’ve got to love NR. And you’ve got to become a subscriber, if you’re not already. Hey, we’ve got an affordable alternative to the actual print magazine – it’s called National Review Digital, and it has everything the paper version has, but comes in handy PDF, Image, and Text formats, and for only $21.95 for a full year (which is about a third the cost of the mag). Oh yes: it comes to you pronto every other Friday at noon (avoiding the trials and tribulations and delays any piece of paper is subjected to by the U.S. Postal Service!). The new issue is available, so why don’t you skedaddle over to National Review Digital and start your subscription, right now, right here.






Comments