Obviously, there are good faith objections one can make to this email, but I thought it was interesting:

Dear Mr.. Goldberg, When debating gay marriage I wish someone could explain what ‘same-sex union between a man and a woman’ means since the this current definition is irrational and meaningless. Some thirty years ago I made the horrid mistake of simply accepting my sisterhood’s definition of fetus as’ just a clump of cells’ while others defined fetus as ‘human life’. Thirty years later science is proving the latter definition of fetus to be the rational definition and I am suffering with the consequences that I had ignorantly advocated the extermination of some 46 million human lives. What did I know at the time I was young, stupid and gullible. Up until I turned forty five years ago I had no idea who was Margaret Sanger and what her philosophy represented. I am horrified with myself for accepting an undefined policy which has destroyed so many innocent lives. I will not be emotionally blackmailed again into accepting words, such as ‘gay marriage’ based on irrational raw emotionalism. The lies and betrayal by my own sisterhood has brought me to where I am today. I not against gay marriage based upon any religious leaning but because the definition is irrational. I wont’ be fooled again. Thanks for your time[Name withheld]NYC, NY PS: I joined the Republican Party in 2004 because of Roe vs. Wade.