Stanley: I take your point, and agree with it in a sort of guilty-delinquent spirit. I know I should try to take in more philosophy, but my temperament is all against it. Case in point: Roger Scruton. Now, I have met Roger a couple of times and like him immensely. (Iโ€™ll be meeting him again June 3rd, when The New Criterion has a dinner for him.) I regard Roger as a hero of our time: he has kept the guttering flame of conservative thought alight in England at considerable personal sacrifice to himself, both professional and financial. I have dutifully bought several of his books, starting with Sexual Desire, which I was hoping might give me some insight into why I dislike homosexuality so much. It didnโ€™t. In fact, I didnโ€™t finish it, nor any of the others. I think I did best with The Philosopher on Dover Beach, which contains, amongst much else, Rogerโ€™s idea that โ€œendarkenmentโ€ ought to be an essential component of a modern education (to counteract the malign effect of the Enlightenment, see?) Roger has a deep, interesting and agile mind, and a great stock of knowledge. Why canโ€™t I finish any of his books? Because I canโ€™t digest philosophy, thatโ€™s why. In the true spirit of the age, I am going to declare that this is NOT MY FAULT. I was born this way. Like being lactose-intolerantโ€ฆ.