The Philly Inquirer, among others, are reporting today that one of Rick Santorumโs top aides is gay. The staffer was โoutedโ by a gay website. Itโs a reprehensible thing to doโinvade a stafferโs personal life like that. And of what relevance is it, say, to any reader of the Philly Inquirer? Santorum has issued a statement praising the staffer, clearly furious that one of his people has been targetted in such a rotten way. Is that the โnewsโ too? Maybe people are shocked Rick Santorum doesnโt actually hate gays? Of course, maybe we really are that bad off. Unfortunately weโre also so bad off that a man who happens to be gay isnโt โallowedโ to work for a senator he wants to work for without his personal life being made โnewsโ by some webguy who decides the staffer is a โhypocriteโ or shouldnโt be able to choose who he wants to work for. Why must legitimate โnewsโ sources follow those marching orders?
Share this story
KL
About the Author
Kathryn Jean Lopez is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the religion editor of National Review. Sign up for her weekly newsletter here. She is the author of A Year with the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments