Rudy camper suggest George Stephanopoulos took his Charlie Rose response out of context:

ROSE:
Barack Obama made a very interesting thing today in pursuit of Osama bin Laden. He said the following — if in fact — he’s in favor of withdrawing all the troops from Iraq, as you know — if in fact there was in Pakistan a realistic evidence of Osama bin Laden, a hot target, and Musharraf was not prepared to go after him, he, as president, would be prepared to go into Pakistan to get him, regardless of what Musharraf did.
Would do you that? That’s a tough stand against terrorism, which you have defined as the number one issue facing the new president?
GIULIANI:
As I have said many, many times, we should redouble and triple our efforts to crush the Taliban and Al Qaida. I say that…
ROSE:
Even if it means going into Pakistan, which is an ally, despite the objections of Musharraf?
GIULIANI:
Certainly would not take that option off the table. You would have to judge that given the circumstances that were presented to you. Hey, these things are all big calls on, is the intelligence correct? Can you actually get him? Are you going to be successful? Will America look foolish because it will make a mistake? There are so many questions that have to be resolved.
But if what you’re asking me is would that be an option that’s on the table, which is we have a chance to catch bin Laden and we have got to do it ourselves because we’re not sure if somebody is going to do it correctly — yeah, I think I would take that option.