A reader offers some theological education:
“Dear Mr. Derbyshire—Fascinating column today. I recall my own confusion
when I read your column in National Review, so I was grateful for your piece
today in that it clarified your main point. Thank you. I have one point of
disagreement with something you wrote today, however, involving the
following paragraph: ‘I can’t even agree with the Roman Catholic church
that homosexuals are “called to chastity.” While I have nothing against
chastity per se – I think it can be an honorable choice for a person to make
in some circumstances, and would even go so far as to say that I believe the
very low status of chastity in popular culture is regrettable – it seems to
me arrogant and unkind to tell people that they are “called to chastity” if
they do not hear the call themselves.’
“From the viewpoint of faith, or belief in the teaching of the Roman
Catholic church, your assertion of perceived arrogance and unkindness misses
the point. Using your own example of an arsonist, I hardly think you or I
would find it arrogant or unkind to tell people they are ‘called to not burn
down your neighbor’s house.’ Likewise, the church views one’s engagement in
homosexual acts (or any sexual activity outside the sacrament of marriage)
as damaging to the person’s soul, a risk that endangers their eternal life
with God in heaven. And furthermore, the church teaches that the meaning of
our very existence is to spend eternity with God in heaven (from the old
Baltimore catechism: Why did God make us? He made us to know Him, love Him
and serve Him so that we may be happy with Him forever in heaven). You
obviously disagree with the church’s point on this matter; fine. However, it
seems a bit off the mark to use terms such as arrogant or unkind, when in
reality the pure motivation is mercy and kindness.
“This particular line of reasoning of yours (in regard to homosexual sex and
the church) seems to be a starting point for general agreement with Andrew
Sullivan and his long-running jihad against the church’s teachings on sexual
morality. That battle, ultimately, is a losing one.”






Comments