One of the rainy-day attractions in my childhood home (Northampton, England)
was the Abington Park Museum. The whole thing was housed in an old manor
house — lots of dark wood panelling & creaky worn oak staircases –
terrifically atmospheric. My favorite exhibit was the mummified hand of an
ancient Egyptian, shriveled and black, taken from some tomb, I suppose.
Also the bits & pieces of Civil War (the English one, not the American) dug
up from local fields — musket, cannon balls, caltrops, and so on. For
girlie interest, there was a terrific collection of costumes from past
centuries. Also a collection of Victorian toys and games — lovely old
19th-century dolls’ houses & the like. At the time, of course, I’d rather
have been home reading “Just William,” but the place made an impression on
me none the less, and I probably, in some indirect & involuntary way,
learned something from it.
Well, yesterday we went to visit some old friends in Stamford, Connecticut.
It was rainy & the kids were fidgeting, so my friends suggested we take them
to the local museum (which neither friend had visited for decades). So off
we went.
What a disappointment! The museum seemed to have no collection at all — we
couldn’t find one, anyway. It was given over mostly to kiddie play rooms
and displays of bogus “conceptual art.” One of the latter consisted of a
room with hundreds of bits of wood scattered on the floor, some tied up in
bundles. I thought it was a construction zone, but no, there was the
portentous little placard on the wall: “Shingles and Shims,” the artwork
was called.
The city fathers of Stamford should be utterly ashamed of themselves. This
is a large, wealthy municipality, home to several major corporations, on
whom it levies heavy taxes — as, of course, it also does on local
home-owners. This is the best they can do by way of a local history
collection? It’s a disgrace.






Comments