Obamaโ€™s Nobel โ€œlectureโ€ offers critics the usual cornucopia of opportunities, but I shall focus on just two statements:

โ€œI am the commander-in-chief of a nation in the midst of two wars.โ€ And here I thought there were three wars. Obamaโ€™s two are Iraq and Afghanistan; missing is what George W. Bush termed the War on Terror and I call the โ€œwar on radical Islam.โ€ Obama apparently reduces that third one to al-Qaeda and counts it as part of the Afghan war. His mistake has real consequences; long after American troops have left Iraq and Afghanistan, Islamists will be attacking and subverting us. If we donโ€™t see their efforts as a war, we lose.

โ€œReligion is used to justify the murder of innocents by those who have distorted and defiled the great religion of Islam.โ€ Here, Obama follows his predecessor in presenting himself as an interpreter of Islam. I ridiculed โ€œImam Bushโ€ for telling Muslims about true Islam and its distortion, and now I must ridicule โ€œSheikh Obamaโ€ for the same. Heโ€™s a politician, not a theologian. Heโ€™s a Christian, not a Muslim. He should steer completely clear from the topic of who are good or bad Muslims.

โ€“ Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.