John is absolutely right that the hijinks at Abu Ghraib were not
torture. I don’t think we can conclude, though, that they had nothing
to do with interrogation. The reason so many military and intel people
have been disciplined beyond just the prison guards (it’s up over 40
now, I think) is that there may be some force to the claim by the prison
guards that they were encouraged by the intel people on-scene to create
an environment that would be conducive to more forthcoming answers to
interrogation. As Gonzales observed, that’s why there are so many
ongoing investigations — to find out what happened, and why. That
doesn’t make it torture — unpleasant coercive interrogation,
notwithstanding the ICRC and Sen. Leahy, is not torture. But the idiocy
that went on may have been related to interrogation.






Comments