Obviously I’m the sort of guy who hums while he eats, so me probably 2 stoopid to understand what he means. But if Specter thinks nominees can’t tip their hand doctrinally on Roe, why has he been prattling on about super-duper precedents, waving Roe charts, and grilling nominees on that very subject? In fact, didn’t he all but lay down a litmus test on Roe for nominees? Isn’t there a contradiction in there?