Okay, going by Sestakโs statement and Dan Fosterโs fine post below, I can only conclude that Sestak is either lying or a blowhard. Because, if heโs telling the truth, that means he mistook a casual offer for a seat on some advisory board (Maritime Commission for the Rules of Card Games on Both Sides of the International Dateline or the Blue Ribbon Panel on the Perils of Accumulated Naval Navel Lint) as some kind of serious bribe to stay out of the Senate race. Right? I mean the whole point of Sestak spilling the beans about the โjob offerโ was for him to bolster his independent-against-the-machine cred. If it wasnโt a job offer but instead was some third-rate perk, he shouldnโt have pretended otherwise to seem like the one honest man in the whorehouse of politics. I hope he gets hounded by local press asking him to explain the disconnect. Something like: โYou said you were offered a job to get out of the race. This wasnโt a job. Weโre you exaggerating then or are you lying now?โ
Share this story

About the Author
Jonah Goldberg is a National Review contributing editor.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments