I have one last thought on the exchange between me and Deroy Murdock.

Deroy Murdock says to me: He can be against adultery without embracing a tort of adultery. Fair enough. I still think it would be quite possible to draw such a tort narrowly so that it targets only commercial enterprises that openly solicit adultery for profit, but I accept Deroy’s point: It’s not fair to make acceptance of a tort of adultery the line between people who care about marriage and people who do not.

But isn’t it even sillier to devote a whole column to the idea that people who haven’t denounced a particular website don’t really care about marriage?

I mean, really Deroy. Wasn’t that silly?