Here’s a state of play from Stephen Spruiell, just up. It includes this news:

But Shadegg still has a chance to win over conservative Republicans like Dana Rohrabacher, a nine-term representative from California who initially backed Blunt but told NRO on Friday afternoon that he had moved back into the “undecided” category. Rohrabacher said he was scheduled to speak with Shadegg over the weekend, and that he would make up his mind sometime next week after hearing Shadegg’s positions on illegal immigration, China, and other policy areas important to him.

Jeff Flake tells Stephen:

“What Shadegg does is, ever since [former House Majority Leader] Dick Armey’s departure, we’ve had a void as far as people who care about policy. John puts the focus back on ideas. The immediate effect is to force the other candidates to come forward on their reform agendas, because Shadegg is going to be bold. Blunt has been using personal friendships and the levers of power to get commitments, because he hasn’t come out with any policies that that he’s going to change. It’s going to be much more interesting now.”

And, for those who have asked me, here are some key numbers:

over 100 of the 231 GOP House members have not yet publicly declared their support for either of the two candidates already running. Given that it only takes 116 votes to win, the voting is secret, and the election is three weeks away