The Washington Post editorial page has taken a startlingly harsh look at the DeLay indictment and finds it pretty wanting: โ€œAt least on the evidence presented so far, the indictment of Mr. DeLay by a state prosecutor in Texas gives us pause. The charge concerns the activities of Texans for a Republican Majority (TRMPAC), a political action committee created by Mr. DeLay and his aides to orchestrate the GOPโ€™s takeover of the Texas legislature in 2002. The issue is whether Mr. DeLay and his political aides illegally used the group to evade the stateโ€™s ban on corporate contributions to candidatesโ€ฆ.This was an obvious end run around the corporate contribution rule. The more difficult question is whether it was an illegal end run โ€” or, to be more precise, one so blatantly illegal that it amounts to a criminal felony rather than a civil violation. For Mr. DeLay to be convicted, prosecutors will have to show not only that he took part in the dodge but also that he knew it amounted to a violation of state law โ€” rather than the kind of clever money-trade that election lawyers engineer all the time.

โ€œMr. DeLayโ€™s spokesman said this month that โ€˜to his knowledge all activities were properly reviewed and approved by lawyersโ€™ for TRMPAC. If so, the criminal law seems like an awfully blunt instrument to wield against Mr. DeLay. If not, we look forward to seeing the evidence.โ€