Iโ€™m no expert, but wouldnโ€™t you think a prosecutor in a racially charged, political heated, nationally watched case would take a few minutes to talk to the sole accuser in the Duke โ€œrapeโ€ case and see if her facts pan out? I mean, he ran on the case in the last election, but he never satisfied his own curiosity about the case personally (or asked lawyers from his office to), even after the media have poked so many holes in her story? Anyway, from the AP:

The district attorney prosecuting three Duke lacrosse players accused of raping a woman at a team party said during a court hearing Friday that he still hasnโ€™t interviewed the accuser about the facts of the case.
โ€œIโ€™ve had conversations with (the accuser) about how sheโ€™s doing. Iโ€™ve had conversations with (the accuser) about her seeing her kids,โ€ Mike Nifong said. โ€œI havenโ€™t talked with her about the facts of that night. โ€ฆ Weโ€™re not at that stage yet.โ€
Nifong made the statement in response to a defense request for any statements the woman has made about the case.
โ€œI understand the answer may not be the answer they want but itโ€™s the true answer. Thatโ€™s all I can give them,โ€ the prosecutor said after the hourlong hearing.
Defense lawyers said outside court that they found Nifongโ€™s statement surprising.
โ€œOne of the most interesting things to me of course is Mr. Nifong did admit that he in fact has basically never talked to this woman and has absolutely no idea what her story is, and yet he has chosen to continue to go forward with this case,โ€ defense lawyer Joseph Cheshire said.
Nifong said none of his assistants have discussed the case with the woman either and only have spoken with her to monitor her well-being. They have left the investigation of the case to police, he said.