In an email, Nick Schulz of TechCentralStation chimes in on Zakaria:

โ€œThat Zakaria stuff is an outrage. He has no idea what heโ€™s talking about. All the interesting ideas about development in recent years have come from the political right or from non-ideological folks (Hernando de Soto, William Easterly, etc.). Fareed cites the WHO success in smallpox. Heโ€™s right, and that was the WHOโ€™s most notable success โ€“ almost two generations ago. Since then the WHO has become a highly politicized agency that has strayed wildly from its core mission. It has badly bungled treatment of malaria and TB โ€“ which, ironically, Fareed mentions at the end of his piece as chronic problems without mentioning WHOโ€™s role in blowing it. And he doesnโ€™t dwell on HIV/AIDS, which the WHO is also managing badly (while the conservative Bush administration has stepped up with serious money and smartly-designed treatment programs). WHO is a textbook case of whatโ€™s wrong with global aid today. The green revolution has been successful, but itโ€™s not typical of the kind of aid conservatives criticize โ€“ namely, government to government transfers. What conservatives have championed (technology transfer and private sector involvement) were instrumental in the green revolution. Iโ€™m not surprised at the gratuitous swipes at conservatives from Fareed, but he might want to get his facts right in the future. Most Africans would put more โ€˜workโ€™ into op/ed columns than he did.โ€