A very nice review over at EuropeNews (Translated into German here). Two kind excerpts:

Comparing this book to Robert Paxton: “The Anatomy of Fascism” is obvious to do. Paxton has written a standard on the subject, wide in range and deep in detail. Yet, Paxton makes a basic dubious assumption, that Soviet Communism is not fascism. Paxton struggles hard to maintain this, and does it by focusing on the expression and actions of self-declared fascist regimes, ignoring those who named themselves otherwise.
Yet, when one considers the nature of Soviet communism and the devastating analysis it has recieved over the last two decades, the conclusion is obvious: Goldberg is right. “Liberal Fascism” many not be as meticously accurate as “The Anatomy of Fascism”, but in the eye of this reviewer, Goldberg hits bulls eye while Paxton ‘merely’ does a good job.

And:

Conclusion
Then, is this book for you? Well, it depends on what kind of understanding of fascism you want. If you desire to understand it as a militaristic top-down dictatorship, skip this book. It would destroy your illusions and leave you in trouble.
If, on the other hand, you would rather understand the seductive nature of fascism, understand what made so many people make so great sacrifices for an ideology this broken, get this book. It’s not perfect, but it doesn’t need to be. It has a more important quality: It’s sound. And earns a heartfelt recommendation from this reviewer.

The criticisms all seem fair enough to me, though at some point I guess we’ll have to discuss Islamofascism a bit more around here.