Why judicial activism has its place
THE never-ending saga of Bush v. Gore has now spilled over twice into the U.S. Supreme Court. At times, the arguments in that lofty tribunal have sounded technical, almost arid, as lawyers from both sides disputed whether the Florida supreme court usurped the legislative power with its (to be charitable) imaginative takeover of the entire recount process, whether an equal-protection clause allowed different counties to use different standards in reading chads, or, more crucially, whether the new standard of counting dimples passed constitutional muster.





Comments