The publisherโs blurb tells us that Charles Friedโs new book โfills the need for an accountโ of constitutional law that is
โfree from legal jargon and clear enough to inform the educated layperson, yet which does not condescend or slight critical nuance, so that its judgments and analyses will engage students, practitioners, judges, and scholars.โ The author himself tells us that โcommercial speech only attains constitutional protection if it is true.โ Well. I wouldnโt ask my parentsโeducated laypersons if I know any at allโto read this book if I wanted any future invitations to visit the old homestead. Nor would I assign it to my (undergraduate) students in constitutional law. At the beginning of the term, they would find it simply bewildering; and by the end, the better among them surpass Fried in their ability to think about the Constitution. Can I sue Harvard University Press?





Comments