70 Year Magazine Archive

Eureka! That Sino-Soviet Split

by Walter Darnell Jacobs

Share this story

Having been applied with a singular lack of success to the Soviet Union, the “science” of Kremlinology is now being used on China. The results are similar. Evidently neither group—Kremlinologist or Sino-Kremlinologist—has ever heard of the “best evidence rule.” The votaries gather thousands of little pieces of pseudo-evidence which they fit to a Procrustean model. Then when the book is too heavy to lift and too dull to read, they shout “Eureka!”

Our current eureka-shouters have discovered a conflict (also termed a “titanic battle”) between the USSR and Communist China. Now let it be said at once that there is some evidence of an old-fashioned factional dispute within international Communism. The question, “When is a dispute a conflict or a split or a battle?” is not answered on the evidence being presented by the Sino-Kremlinologists. They may assert that a dispute is a conflict—and this may be enough for the Harrison Salisbury claque which has the Chinese invasion of Siberia coming any day now. It can hardly satisfy the serious observer.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement