70 Year Magazine Archive

Testing the Bradley Effect

by Jay Cost

Share this story

IN 1982, California gubernatorial candidate Tom Bradley went into Election Day leading in the polls. He lost in a squeaker. In 1989, New York City mayoral candidate David Dinkins had as much as an 18-point lead in the polls over his Republican opponent, Rudy Giuliani. On Election Day, he eked out a narrow victory. That same year, Virginia gubernatorial candidate Douglas Wilder enjoyed as much as a 15-point lead, only to win by a few thousand votes out of nearly 2 million cast.

All three candidates were black. These peculiar results have induced political observers to ask whether there is a systematic “Bradley Effect”-i.e., whether black candidates can expect to poll better among white voters than they perform at the ballot box. As Harvard University post-doctoral fellow Daniel Hopkins recently put it, “During a survey, respondents may be less likely to indicate voting intentions that are socially stigmatized, such as their unwillingness to support a black candidate.”

Jay Cost

About the Author

Jay Cost

Jay Cost is a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the Center for Faith and Freedom at Grove City College.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement