70 Year Magazine Archive

Finds loopholes in the education tax credits

by Alan Reynolds

Share this story

WHEN President Clinton dealt himself a new hand in the middle of the tax-cut game, he claimed that he did so partly because he was unhappy with the House and Senate tax breaks for college. โ€œThey do an inadequate job,โ€ he said, โ€œof opening the doors to college.โ€ Unfortunately, this issue was framed as a debate over which plan can lose the most money, rather than which is most effective.

For the first two years of college, the President proposed a 100 per cent tax credit for the first $1,000 of tuition, and 50 per cent of the next $1,000. The Senate offered a 75 per cent credit for the first $2,000 spent at a community college, or 50 per cent of $3,000. All these plans would cut $1,500 off a taxpayerโ€™s bill, so the differences were trivial. In the end, Congress went along with a modest variation of the Presidentโ€™s plan: A 100 per cent tax credit for the first $1,000 of tuition, 50 per cent for the next $1,000, and 20 per cent for the balance up to $5,000, and 20% for the next $5000.

Alan Reynolds

About the Author

Alan Reynolds

Alan Reynolds, National Reviewโ€™s economics editor from 1972 to 1976, is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of Income and Wealth.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement