From last night’s Sean Hannity show after showing a clip of the changing narrative of the bin Laden raid:
HANNITY: Can you decipher that? Looks like somebody learned a thing or two from Robert Gibbs.
So, if no fire fight took place what exactly are the circumstances surrounding bin Laden’s death? And joining me with analysis, the host of War Stories right here on this network, Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North.
Colonel, welcome back, sir.
OLIVER NORTH, HOST, “WAR STORIES”: Good to be with you, Sean.
HANNITY: It’s a good day. I see that smile on your face.
Look, I don’t know how much — I don’t care. We got bin Laden. That to me is important.
NORTH: You got it.
HANNITY: But they did say that he was hiding behind a woman. They did say he was reaching for weapons. They did say they were being fired upon. All these things now have shifted and changed that I’m having a hard time understanding it. Your thoughts.
NORTH: Well, I think there is a lot of filters between the guys who actually carried this out and the folks that have to stand up and talk about it. The bottom line of the entire operation is, and it’s a good one, that we no longer have to face any kind of a threat from bin Laden and retribution has been effective. Justice has been served.
Now, under the exact width circumstances, I have been on a lot of these kinds of missions, Sean, and there is a lot happening and a lot of different people see things very differently.
Well said, which is why the White House should have waited a little longer to start issuing facts to the press.





Comments