An excellent editorial from Investorโ€™s Business Daily on welfare reform:

But todayโ€™s Washington seems little impressed by the achievement of reducing the welfare rolls from over 5 million to below 2 million in the course of a decade. Congressโ€™ big-spending โ€œrecoveryโ€ package reverts the federal-states welfare funding arrangement to the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) system โ€” in some respects making it worse than those bad old days.
โ€œFor the first time since 1996, the federal government would begin paying states bonuses to increase their welfare caseloads,โ€ noted Heritage Foundation scholars Robert Rector and Katherine Bradley in an analysis released last month.
โ€œIndeed, the new welfare system created by the stimulus bills is actually worse than the old AFDC program because it rewards the states more heavily to increase their caseloads,โ€ they added.
Under Congressโ€™ new scheme, โ€œthe federal government will pay 80% of cost for each new family that a state enrolls in welfare; this matching rate is far higher than it was under AFDC.โ€
Rector and Bradley found that in the first year welfare spending will see its highest rise in history, an increase of more than 20% to exceed $600 billion. The overall cost over the next decade is estimated to reach $1.34 trillion.

National Review was banging this drum in February with โ€œEnding Welfare Reform as We Knew It.โ€