From “Judge Alito’s Radical Views“:

Judge Alito has consistently shown a bias in favor of those in power over those who need the law to protect them. Women, racial minorities, the elderly and workers who come to court seeking justice should expect little sympathy. In the same flat bureaucratic tones he used at the hearings, he is likely to insist that the law can do nothing for them.

Note here that the editors don’t bother to cite examples. Was Alito right on the merits of the law when he ruled against all of those women, racial minorities, senior citizens and workers? If so, does the NYT advocate turning a blind eye to the merits of the law in the service of “justice” as defined by the New York Times editorial board?