Newsweek has a piece up on retired General Scott Gration who “contributed ideas to Obama’s much noted speech on counterterrorism Wednesday.” Some excerpts:

“The United States has to be willing to pursue these terrorists to where they’re planning their logistics operations,” says Gration, who adds he’s “really disappointed with the spin mongers” who focused only on Obama’s aggressive language about Pakistan. “This speech has been a long time coming. It’s not a response to Hillary Clinton or anybody else.” Bill Burton, Obama’s press secretary, says Gration supplies extra “credibility” for a candidate who has never served in the military. “He has an ability to educate voters about what kind of commander in chief Obama will be, in a way few can.”

And on Nukes…

“Our nuclear forces are not a deterrent as powerful as they once were, and yet those nuclear weapons and fissile material provide a threat. If, in my view, they’re not doing a deterrence mission and they pose a threat if terrorists get ahold of them, we ought to be pulling back the number of ICBMs,” he says. “When you have 15,000 to 16,000 weapons floating around, I think you can reduce that number significantly. And make sure nobody else feels a requirement to get new nukes. I believe if you could get rid of all the nuclear weapons this would be a wonderful world.” Even so, Gration says, he’s a “pragmatist.” “As a fighter pilot I stood nuclear alert. I understood that during the cold war we had this requirement. I was defending America in that process. Things have changed right now. But we have to do it in a way that makes sense. I’m not one who just says get rid of everything unilaterally.”
Obama’s views “are very similar to mine,” Gration says.