So says an op-ed in the New York Times, of all places, so it must be true. A key paragraph: “So if alleged hiring and promotion biases don’t explain the underrepresentation of women in math-intensive fields, what does? According to our research, the biggest culprits are rooted in women’s earlier educational choices, and in women’s occupational and lifestyle preferences.” Gee, fancy that. What’s more, a piece in The New Yorker re-explains that social psychology academia is biased against conservatives. Wow. Must be the time change — I better have another cup of coffee.