North Carolina has been having a tendentious debate over โ€œSTEMโ€ subjects versus โ€œliberal artsโ€ eduation. This started last winter when Governor Pat McCrory made some not-too-well-thought-out comments that University funding shouldnโ€™t be based on the โ€œbutts in seats, but how many of those butts can get jobs.โ€

His words gave an opening for university faculty members to claim that the new governor (Republican) was opposed to liberal arts. (Actually, he made something of a swipe at gender studies, not exactly traditional liberal arts.) One UNC-Chapel Hill professor said huffily that the governor โ€œwas not elected to decide what has intellectual value and what does not.โ€

Anyway, this practical-vs.-intellectual theme continues. It led a UNC-Chapel Hill undergraduate to ask a loaded question of a UNC Board of Governors member. She noted that an employer survey indicated that employers value communications skills over technical ones: โ€œConsidering how the Board of Governor seems to prefer teaching STEM majors, or technical skills, how do you feel about these statistics?โ€

She happened to contact a BOG member who knew a thing or two about surveys, business, and logic. His reply was published by the Pope Center.