A story on Inside Higher Ed today discusses the work the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges has been doing on a system to measure and publicize how well schools educate their undergraduates. I’m skeptical that an accountability system that really allows students, parents, and other interested parties to separate the wheat from the large volume of chaff will emerge from any organization inside the higher- education community, but this is an important objective. With the very high costs of college, it’s crucial that students and parents be able to identify institutions that actually add educational value, rather than merely certify the passage of courses. For starters, it would be good to know if a school enhances a student’s literacy. We know from last year’s National Assessment of Adult Literacy that many college students graduate with pathetic literacy skills (I wrote about that here) and many kids who coast through college taking easy, stress-free courses will wind up in easy, low-pay jobs. We have a vast higher-ed establishment that depends on people not making informed decisions about the relationship between costs and benefits in college. The door stands wide open for someone to step forward with a reliable measuring rod for institutional effectiveness.
Share this story

About the Author
George Leef is the director of external relations at the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal. He is the author of The Awakening of Jennifer Van Arsdale: A Political Fable for Our Time.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments