Common Core is supposed to improve learning for students in in their K-12 years. There are many reasons to doubt that it will do that. In todayโ€™s Pope Center piece, English professor Mary Grabar argues that Common Core will have a detrimental impact on higher education.

She writes, โ€œI have taught college English for twenty years and have researched Common Core for the last three years. I know that the project-based learning, the replacement of extensive reading and papers with group discussions on selective snippets, the replacement of literary classics with โ€˜informational textsโ€™ and video, and the diversion from writing to โ€™speaking and listening skillsโ€™ will make students even less prepared to do the work of a traditional English class.โ€

Moreover, Mary points out, colleges will be expected to align their courses with Common Core standards. That will only put further pressure on professors to lower their standards.

I find especially revealing a comment from the director of teacher preparation at Arizona State that Common Core: โ€œStudents will come not with a new set of information they didnโ€™t have before but with different types of thinking that really are required for success in higher education.โ€ Those โ€œdifferent types of thinkingโ€ probably mean the social attitudes that are dear to โ€œprogressiveโ€ educationists, not a better command of reason.