George has highlighted a Wall Street Journal review, โCan U Read Kant?,โ of Markโs book, The Dumbest Generation.
Markโs point is spot on. Todayโs students who โO.D.โ daily on TV, Web-surfing, video games, and other digital diversions are getting dumber, and their elders ought to be seeing that they read books and use digital technologies to improve their minds.
Reversing this digital dumbing-down becomes all the harder because of the dwindling of ranks of parents and teachers who are fully aware, or perhaps even recall, what the Journal refers to as โa weightier learning traditionโ centered on books, debate, and ideas.
So many of these instructors themselves, like their charges, are knowledge-averse. Specifically, instructor and student alike have by now been educated in schools under the sway of โconstructivism,โ the โprogressiveโ dogma that knowledge resides within the young human being, necessitating only that the teacher โfacilitateโ its inevitable, butterfly-like emergence. Another conceit aligned with this prevalent pedagogy is that โcritical thinkingโ can somehow develop independent of knowledge, i.e., one can think critically about nothing. Touted as โstudent-centeredโ and โself-esteemโ-engendering education, this approach has led to a drastic devaluing of knowledge itself.
In short, knowledge-light digital pursuits have dove-tailed with the even longer entrenchment of knowledge-light formal education, and those capable of reinstating knowledge-rich learning, electronic and classroom-based, are farther and fewer between.





Comments