Stefan Gleason of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation writes
here about the recent University of Miami case where the school
has capitulated to a demand by a union that it go along with a โcard checkโ
campaign, which means that the targeted employees (janitors) wonโt actually
get to vote on unionization in a secret ballot, but instead the union will
be declared victorious once a majority of the workers have signed cards that
supposedly attest to their desire for union representation. This โcard
checkโ procedure is notoriously abusive.
Desperate for new revenue sources, organized labor has been looking more at
higher education. Unions function best in an environment thatโs free from
competition. While there is some degree of competition among schools, itโs
not like General Motors and Toyota.
Last year, the UAW won bargaining rights at Carroll College in Wisconsin
(where I happen to have earned my BA). The trouble in all instances of
unionization is that it turns what ought to be an individual decision into
one of majority rule, thereby compelling some professors, janitors, and so
on to accept (and pay for, unless itโs in a right to work state)
representation they donโt want. That rule, part of the National Labor
Relations Act, is completely inconsistent with individual liberty and ought
to be junked.






Comments