Charlotte Allen writes:

Until just recently โ€” this year, to be exact โ€” at many of the nationโ€™s journalism schools youโ€™d think it was still 1973. That was the year the Watergate reporting of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein for the Washington Post helped topple a sitting president. Back then every college English major in the country wanted to work for a big-city print newspaper like the Post and become a celebrity investigative reporter like Woodward and Bernstein, nemeses of Richard Nixon, who resigned in 1974 during the Watergate scandal. Now, however, even Rick Redfern, the bearded, insufferable Woodward-Bernstein clone in โ€œDoonesbury,โ€ has lost his job, the movie State of Play, starring Russell Crowe as yet another old-school investigative reporter doing homage to Woodward and Bernstein, tanked at the box office, and newspapers are hoping for a government bailout (so far resisted by the Obama administration) on the theory that they perform a public service that taxpayers ought to subsidize. Journalism schools, which once cultivated the mystique of the pure-of-heart reporter speaking truth to power, are hastily revamping their antiquated curricula to conform to a completely different business model โ€” part of which seems to be recognizing for the first time that journalism is a business, not a priest-like calling.

Speaking as a 2006 J-school grad here: This is substantially true, especially the bit about journalism studentsโ€™ Woodward-Bernstein worship, but I think itโ€™s been the case for some time that J-schools are focusing more on โ€œNew Media.โ€ The trend just got a huge kick in the rear this year (as Allen demonstrates in the rest of the article) with the economic collapse. Itโ€™s becoming clear that the demise of the newspaper isnโ€™t a long-term trend to keep in mind but an imminent disaster that demands an immediate reaction.

Of course, J-school graduatesโ€™ fates lie much more with the industry than with college curricula. The problem is that while information may โ€œwant to be freeโ€ โ€” mainly because some people are willing to distribute, via the Internet, other peopleโ€™s information for free โ€” hardly anyone wants to get on the phone, much less leave the house, to collect information for free. The powers that be have to find some way to make full-time reporting on the local level pay, and so far, the Internet isnโ€™t doing that.