We werenโ€™t quite prepared for the reaction to the Pope Centerโ€™s recent proposal to revamp general education at UNCโ€“Chapel Hill.

Background: There is no core curriculum at Chapel Hill. As their generation has been doing since pre-school, high-self-esteem students โ€œconstructโ€ their own educations, reflecting their โ€œnatural curiosityโ€ and โ€œdesire to learn.โ€ Students at Chapel Hill can select from 4700 courses, including such gems as โ€œCowboys, Samurai, and Rebels in Film and Fictionโ€ or โ€œThe Gardens, Shrines, and Temples of Japan,โ€ rather than, say, โ€œAmerican History up to 1865.โ€

A number of students were offended by the idea that their elders might know better than they what they ought to learn. A member of the Class of 2015 wrote: โ€œI have chosen my own path, I have done well, and itโ€™s my education. I am ready to do whatever it takes to protect my intellectual freedom.โ€

In todayโ€™s Clarion Call article, Jay Schalin and Jenna Robinson (authors of the original report) respond: โ€œBut if students already know what they need to learn, then what is the point of a college? They could just go to the library or sit in front of a computer screen all day.โ€ They give nine other responses to critics as well.