Marc Morano sent around this gut-buster from the winningly named Planet Moron.

Great satire: ‘Without consensus, scientific conclusions would remain vulnerable to new data’
Excerpt: This is a standard smear tactic used by global warming deniers in which they take observed data and apply it in a straightforward manner to reach verifiable conclusions. Okay, that doesn’t sound as bad when you say it out loud. However, we’ve already established that The Consensus is true so the real question is not so much how do we subject it to critical examination that may yield superior climate models and in so doing generate information that could be better acted upon by policy makers, it’s how do we defend it from any and all criticism. Fortunately, Al Gore has two suggestions on how to better shore up the science underlying The Consensus:1. Vandalism
2. Suppression

Read the whole thing here.