Apparently another IPCC mistake has been uncovered (h/t Ed Morrissey).

It should sound familiar, as we noted it here nine months ago. It’s just that only now is the seal broken on the notion of the IPCC being sacrosanct — fawningly described as a research organization led by a “climate scientist,” and otherwise portrayed with reverence (if convenient inaccuracy) as a scientific body interested first and foremost in the pursuit of truth.

Fortunately, it’s now okay to write about IPCC lapses, errors, and hysteria (Ed M. does a good job of enumerating them) — all the red flags demonstrating that this political body posing as a scientific body should not be relied upon for anything.

As I believe CEI and others will be able to further demonstrate when we finally get judicial review of EPA’s “endangerment” finding.