Politico:

Backed by the business lobby, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) is proposing an economic stimulus amendment to streamline environmental regulations for projects funded by the stimulusโ€“ a move that could ignite a firestorm in the environmental community.
The amendment for the stimulus bill, now being debated in the Senate, would give the government a tight, 270-day deadline to complete environmental reviews of stimulus projects required under the National Environmental Policy Act, which environmentalists consider the Holy Grail of environmental laws.
โ€œThis bill aims to streamline NEPA so reviews are done within nine months of any stimulus bill being passed,โ€ Barrasso said. โ€œIf these projects are indeed โ€˜shovel ready,โ€™ they will be able to meet a nine-month deadline. Otherwise they should face the ax.โ€
Usually there are no time limits on NEPA reviews. The law requires government agencies to examine the environmental impacts of their projects, a tool that environmentalists have relied on for decades to revise or stop projects that pose dangers to the environment or animal species.
More than a dozen environmental groups have written senators, arguing that the stimulus is already chock-full of projects that have completed environmental reviews and would not be held up.
And Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is currently working on a counteramendment that would mandate all stimulus funded projects comply with NEPA or not be funded.
โ€œThis is an absolutely essential review to ensure public involvement in public works decisions,โ€ said Greenpeace global warming campaign director Steven Biel. โ€œThere are more than enough shovel-ready projects out there that have already undergone NEPA reviews. There is absolutely no reason why this process needs to be waived.โ€