Be sure to read Andy McCarthy over on the homepage today, as he examines the Obama administrationโ€™s Alinskyite effort to alter the terms of debate in the public square: โ€œoverseas contingency operationโ€ for war; โ€œindividuals detained at Guantanamo Bayโ€ for enemy combatants; โ€œman-caused disastersโ€ for terrorism. Doubtless, those good, old-fashioned terms will be kept in reserve, and trotted out for use in the most preposterous contexts, in true Orwellian fashion.

The last of the three Newspeak items above is the most portentious for Planet Goreโ€™s policy ambit. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitanoโ€™s efforts to avoid the term โ€œterrorismโ€ in favor of โ€œman-caused disastersโ€ prompted a reporter from Germanyโ€™s Spiegel Online to ask whether the U.S. was still under threat from Islamic terrorism. Her response?

Although I did not use the word โ€œterrorism,โ€ I referred to โ€œman-causedโ€ disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.

Madame Secretary is no longer restricted to the thankless task of preventing terror attacks here at home, but at preventing โ€œman-caused disastersโ€ of all kinds. (And apparently, she is ready to confront her expanded portfolio of disasters cheerfully, having moved past the politics of fear.) There can be little doubt that by this โ€œnuance,โ€ the rhetorical space is being cleared to involve DHS in the Obama administrationโ€™s climate-change efforts.

As Chris Horner and I were saying over e-mail last week: get ready for the global war on carbon terror.