The New York Times had a piece out yesterday on our star’s lack of sunspots and what that might do to Earth’s weather. The article, however, does its best to discredit the idea that the giant ball of super-heated gas at the center of our solar system might affect our climate:

With better telescopes on the ground and a fleet of Sun-watching spacecraft, solar scientists know a lot more about the Sun than ever before. But they do not understand everything. Solar dynamo models, which seek to capture the dynamics of the magnetic field, cannot yet explain many basic questions, not even why the solar cycles average 11 years in length.
Predicting the solar cycle is, in many ways, much like predicting the stock market. A full understanding of the forces driving solar dynamics is far out of reach, so scientists look to key indicators that correlate with future events and create models based on those.

And . . .

The idea that solar cycles are related to climate is hard to fit with the actual change in energy output from the sun. From solar maximum to solar minimum, the Sun’s energy output drops a minuscule 0.1 percent.

Got that? Be skeptical of the solar models, but embrace Al Gore’s climate change models.